Chronic Absenteeism

Chronic Absenteeism measures the number of students who attended less than 90% of school days. This indicator includes elementary, middle, and high schools in the City of St. Louis, St. Louis County, and St. Charles County, and includes public and charter schools. In 2016, 10% of all students were chronically absent, which means 22,594 students attended less than 90% of school days.

Chronic Absenteeism Indicator Scores

City of
St. Louis

58

St. Louis
County

40

St. Charles
County

69

St. Clair
County

Data Source: Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2016

What does this score mean?

A score of 100 represents racial equity, meaning there are no racial disparities in outcomes between black and white populations. The lower the Equity Score, the greater the disparity.

For Chronic Absenteeism, a score of 100 — a score reflecting racial equity — would mean black and white children have the same school attendance rates. It is important to note that for this indicator, equity is not our only goal; we also want to improve outcomes for all races.

WHAT DOES THIS ANALYSIS MEAN?

Black students are 56% more likely to be chronically absent than white students. Black students were the most likely to be chronically absent (15%), followed by white students (9.6%). Hispanic students were the least likely to be chronically absent (9.3%). High school students were much more likely to be chronically absent (20.5%) than K-8 students (11.6%). If chronic absenteeism rates were equitable, then 1,336 fewer black students would be chronically absent.

    WHY DOES CHronic Absenteeism MATTER?

    WHICH CALLS TO ACTION FROM THE FERGUSON COMMISSION’s REPORT ARE LINKED WITH THIS INDICATOR?

    The Ferguson Commission’s report states, “Some schools, districts, and states use early-warning data to identify students at high risk for dropping out. These early-warning systems use academic indicators such as course grades, GPA, class rank, behavior marks, and attendance rates […] allowing the schools to intervene before it is too late.” Specific calls to action to address these concerns include:

    Questions for Further Investigation:

    • Why is there a racial disparity in Chronic Absenteeism?
    • What can St. Louis do to reduce racial disparities in Chronic Absenteeism?
    • What initiatives are currently underway to reduce racial disparities in Chronic Absenteeism?

    How can I learn more about this issue?

    %Learn more about chronic absenteeism from Attendance Works, an organization that conducts local and national applied research. Its most recent research paper is a state-level analysis of the relationship between school attendance and standardized test scores: Absences Add Up: How School Attendance Influences Student Success.

    If you are a parent in the City of St. Louis who needs help improving your child’s school attendance, the Truancy Initiative Project is a voluntary diversion program of St. Louis City Family Court designed to improve the school attendance of referred juveniles. In the 2016-2017 school year, the Truancy Initiative Project served 239 students, 77% of whom improved their attendance.

    Chronic Absenteeism Data

    Students who attended 90% or less of school days

     AllBlackWhiteDisparity RatioEquity Score
    Chronically Absent Students
    4,6153,705444
    Total Students
    33,35224,6744,625
    Chronic Absenteeism Rate
    13.80%15.00%9.60%1.563 to 158

    Data Source: Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2016

    Students who attended 90% or less of school days

     AllBlackWhiteDisparity RatioEquity Score
    Chronically Absent Students
    13,3486,9994,913
    Total Students
    130,80947,53966,919
    Chronic Absenteeism Rate
    10.20%14.70%7.30%2.014 to 140

    Data Source: Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2016

    Students who attended 90% or less of school days

     AllBlackWhiteDisparity RatioEquity Score
    Chronically Absent Students
    4,6664443,701
    Total Students
    56,4334,17946,179
    Chronic Absenteeism Rate
    8.80%10.60%8.00%1.325 to 169

    Data Source: Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, 2016

    No Data Available